Last week in the city of Arcadia, outside Los Angeles, a grove of 250 oaks and sycamores was cut down to make way for 500,000 cubic yards of sediment that, for 60 years, has collected behind the nearby Santa Anita Dam and, now, must be dredged and dumped somewhere. In protest, several tree sitters took to the canopy, some of which was over 100 years old, but to no avail. As the LA Times reported:
Among them was Julia Posin, 23, an anthropology student at UCLA. "It was my first tree-sitting, and I could never have prepared myself for what I experienced," she said. "They were pulling branches off trees with chainsaws and bulldozing the trunks. Startled birds did not know where to go in the chaos."
"I started to cry in the tree," she added. "A forest that had taken a century to create was demolished in a matter of hours.” |
The Pasadena Audubon Society and others campaigned to save these particular trees, which stood on 11 acres of Los Angeles County land, arguing that surely another solution could be found. The lot was a place worth saving, as the preamble to an online petition explained:
This woodland, which includes oak, sycamore, California bay, elderberry, toyon, sugar bush and many other native plant species, provides habitat for bats, deer, bear, owl, hawk, and other bird and wildlife species. … [It] is located at the northern end of an urban trail and, as flatland with a wide road winding through it, is especially suitable for children, the elderly, and equestrians …. |
And yet, the local neighborhood association chose not to stand up for the trees, because the alternative, they were told, was 100,000 trucks a year rumbling through their streets, creating safety and pollution problems. That’s a tough call—perhaps one that no neighborhood would have to make, if the greater community (which certainly benefits from the reservoir) were to help conceive and fund a better option.
Up in Seattle, meanwhile, it seems about 150 maples need to be removed to make way for a viaduct. They’re smaller—only three-to-10 inches in diameter—so the City has offered them free to anyone willing to organize and pay for one or more to be transplanted. But, that's a tall order: relocating a 30-foot tree is likely to cost about $15,000 dollars.
Trees have always fallen in the wake of progress, and it’s not always possible or economical to save them. (If a stand of trees falls in the forest, meanwhile, and there’s no media to hear, does it make a sound? Rarely.) But whenever a tree is saved, it’s rather uplifting—all the more so in cities. Maybe someone in Seattle should buy one or two of those maples, for the sake of a positive story? Or imagine if every city, or county, set aside an emergency tree fund to help save a neighborhood grove, someway somehow, in a pinch.